Foxconn G31MX Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardFoxconn G31MX Series  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '18 at 12:12
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6540
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 78
1-Core 26.8
2-Core 36.8
36% 47.2 Pts
4-Core 44.7
8-Core 44.5
6% 44.6 Pts
64-Core 50.3
3% 50.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3450
Sapphire(174B E400) 512MB
Driver: atidxx32.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.85
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.68%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP0411N 40GB-$30
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TW100-08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 26 18 23 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 24.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 23
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G31MX Series Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn G31MX Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 44% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback