bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WB
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120626
Uptime12.5 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 00:35
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 121
60% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 324
34% 271 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.26
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.9% Outstanding
Lighting 110
Reflection 142
Parallax 140
90% 131 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 132
Splatting 110
96% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 96 93 105 95 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.8% Below average
Read 222
Write 130
Mixed 120
SusWrite 102
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 16.8
60% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 44.3
DQ Mixed 70
62% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HMS5C4040ALE640 4TB
423GB free
Firmware: MPAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 57 64 64 64 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 86.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 63.7
46% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30
27GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 51 55 56 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 52.3
Write 53
Mixed 37
SusWrite 54.5
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 61%
FM MEMORETTE SWING 2GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 5.8
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 6.2
10% 9.55 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4D33373842353237334348302D4348392020 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback