Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	82.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 UD4
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180625
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '18 at 12:07
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% , 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 84.7 1-Core 128 2-Core 255 86% 156 Pts	4-Core 507 8-Core 927 86% 717 Pts	64-Core 1,376 85% 1,376 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3232) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.2% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 115 Parallax 102 85% 107 fps	MRender 94.8 Gravity 98.7 Splatting 88.5 76% 94 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1035 519 316 316 318 318 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	204% Outstanding	Read 1,884 Write 849 Mixed 620 SusWrite 470 210% 956 MB/s	4K Read 50.5 4K Write 154 4K Mixed 55.8 230% 86.9 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 992 DQ Mixed 64.3 226% 475 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 204% Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 556GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 147 146 145 146 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 154 Write 149 Mixed 107 SusWrite 146 102% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 109%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 173 173 177 179 180 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 170 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 176 113% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.1 218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 101%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 726GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 149 143 142 150 142 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 175 Write 168 Mixed 136 SusWrite 144 209% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 142% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 67%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 119 Write 120 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 0.1 108% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 68%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 149 143 142 151 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61% Good	Read 150 Write 145 Mixed 108 SusWrite 144 185% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 61%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00RWYB1 6TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 160 Write 152 Mixed 118 SusWrite 0.1 135% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 62%
Intenso Micro Line 16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 2910 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.3 3.9 3.3 3.5 3.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	6.9% Terrible	Read 27.2 Write 8.2 Mixed 1.5 SusWrite 3.4 10% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 35% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.9% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	60.3% Good	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 16.9 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 10.6 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 UD4-CF Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 93%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	39x
Core i9-7900XIntel $413Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	28x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	13x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	9x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	6x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	6x

RAM
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	26x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	25x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $795

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16