Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	1.42% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 176 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 350 47% 353 Pts	64-Core 276 17% 276 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.11 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 67.2 Reflection 66.2 Parallax 63.1 55% 65.5 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 64.9 54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Richdisk device 64GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.1 6.2 5.5 7.9 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	1.42% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 8.3 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 6.2 2% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 0% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.42% Great: 31%
Richdisk device 1.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 157GB free Firmware: 1010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 5.1 6.2 5.5 7.8 7.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.22% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 4.5 Mixed 8 SusWrite 6.2 5% 6.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.2% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 26.2 MC Mixed 20.7 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 18.2 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	21x
Value DDR4 2133 C15 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 68%, 7,794 samples	17x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	12x

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $154