PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus X99-A (all builds) |
Memory | 23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170113 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 18 '18 at 08:51 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
88.5%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
278GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 453 454 454 444 458 MB/s
|
117%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
459GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 119 120 120 120 120 MB/s
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
533GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 155 156 156 155 157 MB/s
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
393GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 88 89 91 90 88 MB/s
|
64.7%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
125%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 1,232x |
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 326x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 143x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 171x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 128x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 109x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $748 |