Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 03 '18 at 19:38
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 248
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 632
66% 527 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 8593) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 159
Parallax 136
122% 148 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 139
Splatting 115
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,925
Write 1,310
Mixed 498
273% 1,244 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 54.4
210% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 644
562% 841 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199
104GB free
Firmware: 2.50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 128 122 130 128 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 126
Write 196
Mixed 165
SusWrite 128
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 39.1
146% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 136
115% 167 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 66%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
106GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 311 347 351 352 353 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 342
Write 339
Mixed 282
SusWrite 341
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 42.8
152% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 145
134% 206 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 116%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
368GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 94 93 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 93.3
62% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII FORMULA Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII FORMULA - $284

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $917
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback