Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 7763W6D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 7763W6D  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 7763W6D
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110322
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 25 '16 at 02:08
Run Duration400 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo L7500
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 18.3
2-Core 34.7
29% 38.8 Pts
4-Core 34.4
8-Core 35.7
5% 35.1 Pts
64-Core 35.2
2% 35.2 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family
Legend(17AA 20B5) 384MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.23% Terrible
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 0.15
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.23 fps
MRender 0.24
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.48
0% 0.27 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.23%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.6% Above average
Read 258
Write 217
Mixed 217
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 18.6
76% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 96.6
DQ Write 86.4
DQ Mixed 49.6
49% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 116%
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB
116GB free, PID ce21
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Read 3.66
Write 4.03
Mixed 3.51
5% 3.73 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.68
4K Mixed 0.19
31% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 14%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback