HP Presario CQ62 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Presario CQ62 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1484
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100426
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 14:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron Dual Core T3300
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41% Average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 55.1
37% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 54.5
8-Core 57.5
7% 56 Pts
64-Core 55.1
3% 55.1 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
HP(103C 1484)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.32% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.37 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.48
0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.32%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320423AS 320GB-$40
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006HPM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 59 70 81 85 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 86.5
Write 85.4
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 75
54% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 51%
WDC WD25 00BEVS-22UST0 250GB
233GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 24 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 23.9
34% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M4 70T2864EH3-CF7 7F7F7F7F43 RMN2230MJ48D8F-800 3GB
800, 800 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.23 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 14%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Presario CQ62 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ62 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback