Today's hottest deals

Asrock H110M-HDS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-HDS  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 14:38
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4500-$37
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 224
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 220
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250
Asus(1043 0462) 1GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 14.4
0% 9.02 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 13.9
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VT100-49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 36 28 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 51.8
Write 58.8
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 39.4
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 38%
CCR-70 1GB
1GB free, PID e0ed
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.2 5.6 5.6 5.7 5.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 4.8
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.5
9% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 4%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB
157GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 35 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 36.4
Write 36
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 35.5
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-HDS Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback