Medion WAM2040

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion WAM2040  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION WAM2040
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '18 at 02:18
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50
U1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 90.1
1-Core 23.2
2-Core 46.9
41% 53.4 Pts
4-Core 40
8-Core 46
6% 43 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6150
Wistron(17C0 4075) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 259.47
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.04% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 0.08
Parallax 0.06
0% 0.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.04%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2552GSX 250GB-$47
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 48.7
Write 51
Mixed 43.1
36% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.19
56% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 31%
Innostor IS888 USB bridge 1TB
608GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 26.3
Write 20.5
Mixed 22.6
29% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.25
63% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback