Packard EasyNote_SJ51

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Packard EasyNote_SJ51 (all builds)
Motherboard	PACKARD EasyNote_SJ51
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080312
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '17 at 16:09
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	12%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-50 289 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Memory 22.5 1-Core 11.6 2-Core 22.4 13% 18.8 Pts	4-Core 23 8-Core 23.2 3% 23.1 Pts	64-Core 18.8 1% 18.8 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 35%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250827AS 250GB 3,473 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1904 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 4505684870 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3942 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1945 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 44 22181969960 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1413 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 24 24 152808 (C2) HDA temperature 40 56 68719476776 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 74 56 243974292 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 53 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	26.8% Poor	Read 47.1 Write 46.3 Mixed 20.2 28% 37.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.61 4K Mixed 0.25 57% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DRAM Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.86% Terrible	MC Read 1.5 MC Write 1.4 MC Mixed 1.6 4% 1.5 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.4 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.03 GB/s	Latency 303 13% 303 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Packard EasyNote_SJ51

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)