Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '18 at 00:07
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 75
2-Core 147
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 399
41% 333 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3979) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 65.1
Reflection 68
Parallax 61
53% 64.7 fps
MRender 72.4
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 55
51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
42GB free
Firmware: 600A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 512
Write 208
Mixed 230
69% 316 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 13
77% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 42.7
59% 106 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 85%
Monster Digital SSD 120G 120GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.2% Above average
Read 464
Write 141
Mixed 191
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 11.9
81% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 39
54% 99.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
535GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 142
Mixed 143
116% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.21
4K Write 2.76
4K Mixed 0.36
141% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
490GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 227
Write 158
Mixed 170
139% 185 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.56
4K Mixed 0.29
115% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
324GB free
Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 51.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 65.5
50% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.51
4K Mixed 0.51
128% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
61GB free
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Read 119
Write 222
Mixed 127
116% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.61
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.3
135% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 109%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 256GB
208GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 73.7
Write 79.4
Mixed 67.6
95% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.83
4K Write 3.03
4K Mixed 1.95
195% 3.94 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
42% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback