HP p7-1449

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1449  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2AE0
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121105
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 22 '24 at 02:55
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
46.6% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 54.3
2-Core 92.1
47% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 124
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 28.4
0% 18.4 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 24.5
19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 6.68%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 94 38 58 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 57.8
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 320GB-$54
117GB free
Firmware: JC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 86 88 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 76.5
Write 73.7
Mixed 47.1
SusWrite 87.3
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
158GB free
Firmware: 3.ADG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 64 66 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 68.9
Write 70
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 65.8
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 43%
Samsung HM020GI 20GB
15GB free
Firmware: YU100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 26.2
Write 32.8
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 31.9
21% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 18%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 500GB
212GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 32 28 30 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 27.9
Write 28.5
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 29.9
20% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA MK3263GSXN 320GB
298GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 59 59 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
Read 57.2
Write 56.8
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 58.6
69% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
73% 0.83 MB/s
ST750LM0 22 HN-M750MBB 750GB
667GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.1 5.2 9.2 6.4 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 52.3
Write 78.6
Mixed 42
SusWrite 7.1
60% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HTS547575A9E384 750GB
558GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.6 6.4 11 7.4 5.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 77.3
Write 56.6
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 8.4
55% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 36%
ST320LT0 09-9WC142 320GB
298GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 58 59 59 59 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.5% Poor
Read 75.1
Write 61.7
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 58.6
81% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
52% 0.63 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-U8G-1600 TIMETEC-U8G-1600 TIMETEC-U8G-1600 TIMETEC-U8G-1600 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 10.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 38 60 21.6" 1280 720 HWP288A HP 2210
Typical p7-1449 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1449

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback