Samsung 500R5M/500R5W/501R5M

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	9.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Samsung 500R5M/500R5W/501R5M (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP500R5M-X09HK
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170216
Uptime	13.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '17 at 11:30
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 180 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 273 36% 273 Pts	64-Core 273 17% 273 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia 940MX 36,213 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Sanyo(144D C792) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	9.89% Terrible	Lighting 13.5 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 10.6 11% 11.4 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 13.7 Splatting 8.87 8% 9.35 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.89% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000 128GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT21K0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 505 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 258 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 5 (AE) Unknown 99 99 1 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 911 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 65 52 35 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 16672357 (F1) Unknown 99 99 878 (F2) Unknown 99 99 1057 (F9) Unknown 99 99 878	109% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 467 Mixed 498 110% 494 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 35.2 158% 57.6 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 20.1 85% 194 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 331GB free Firmware: AM003F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1354 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 378 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 498 (0A) Spinup retry count 107 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 256 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 79 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7734 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 150324903961 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 177 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 249 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	55.1% Above average	Read 105 Write 87 Mixed 82.9 69% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.22 73% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 60%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	7.02% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 14.8 Mixed 12.6 19% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.25 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.59 37% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.02% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB 14,447 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	66.1% Good	MC Read 23.8 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 20.5 67% 23.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 20.3 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 500R5M/500R5W/501R5M Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 500R5M/500R5W/501R5M

CPU
Core i7-7500UIntelBench 48%, 139,101 samples	61x
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	6x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	6x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	56x
940MXNvidiaBench 9%, 36,213 samples	14x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	10x

SSD
CV3-8D256 256GBLiteonBench 75%, 4,538 samples	6x
CV3-8D128 128GBLiteonBench 68%, 3,328 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
SF4641G8CKHIWDFSEG 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 2,421 samples	27x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	19x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16