Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3800 APU 1,505 User benchmarks, average bench 43% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 50.2 1-Core 38.3 2-Core 76.6 34% 55 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 126 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7450 10,238 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 212F) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.66% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 1.9 2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.66% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 256GB 2,366 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 190GB free (System drive) Firmware: XD0R00Z2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 109 Write 144 Mixed 115 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 19.8 70% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 23.1 DQ Write 50.5 DQ Mixed 30.7 25% 34.8 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 107%
Monster MONSTER DIGITAL 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 13GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 31.2 Write 15.3 Mixed 13.7 22% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 56% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/2GX M378B5273DH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/2GX 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.1% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 8 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A8-3800 APUAMDBench 43%, 1,505 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	1x

RAM
16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 2x4GBMicronBench 46%, 3,045 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16