Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+ 2,253 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.27% Terrible	Memory 6.84 1-Core 35.2 2-Core 68.5 18% 36.8 Pts	4-Core 67.8 8-Core 64.6 9% 66.2 Pts	64-Core 68.2 4% 68.2 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 9.27% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 4,836 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Elitegroup(1019 2601) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS2 50G2B0A-00SM 250GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: X611 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 212 Write 132 Mixed 136 35% 160 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 9.44 55% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 61.3 DQ Mixed 10.3 17% 32.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 60%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39 64,707 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 154GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 86.1 Write 94.2 Mixed 90.8 68% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.34 94% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 60%
Monster MONSTER DIGITAL 16GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	6% Terrible	Read 23.4 Write 4.11 Mixed 6.97 11% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.01 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.02 27% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.5 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 0.7 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 0.8 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 434 9% 434 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16