Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.9% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '17 at 12:34
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5820K-$391
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.5% Very good
SC Int 89.9
SC Float 94.1
SC Mixed 88.8
73% 90.9 Pts
QC Int 323
QC Float 339
QC Mixed 336
75% 332 Pts
MC Int 733
MC Float 776
MC Mixed 781
114% 763 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$370
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 368.39
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Lighting 79.9
Reflection 82
Parallax 75.2
24% 79 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 81.4
34% 80.1 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 72%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 327
Mixed 376
88% 396 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 31
144% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 47.8
87% 168 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 160
Mixed 160
124% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.28
87% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64
769GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 79.2
Mixed 51.8
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.43
114% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 57%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$98
1TB free
Firmware: 82.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 110
Write 91.3
Mixed 92.4
74% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 2.31
4K Mixed 0.28
104% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 89%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
451GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 58.2
Mixed 54.8
45% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.23
77% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$145
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 86%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 3,758 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,987
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $340Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $85
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $160Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $290Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $121
Intel Core i5-8600K $225AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $160SanDisk Extreme 64GB $44
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $951SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $59HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $219SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback