Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 20:38
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT-$450
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 68
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1,102
98% 831 Pts
64-Core 2,130
132% 2,130 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
MSI(1462 373E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 151
Reflection 150
Parallax 148
123% 150 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 124
Splatting 117
113% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
447GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1566 871 892 920 921 937 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,012
Write 3,094
Mixed 2,188
SusWrite 1,018
470% 2,078 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 75.8
252% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,389
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 1,160
875% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 274%
Great: 472%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
448GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3317 3198 3347 1973 953 956 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 1,945
Write 1,915
Mixed 2,066
SusWrite 2,291
464% 2,054 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 73.6
242% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,427
DQ Write 1,098
DQ Mixed 1,187
908% 1,237 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 349%
Great: 472%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
868GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 871 887 883 882 881 883 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 466
Write 885
Mixed 416
SusWrite 881
151% 662 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 6.6
24% 8.93 MB/s
DQ Read 99.9
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 106
105% 161 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 448%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 38 34 45 41 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 68%
Amd-raid Array 2 1TB
915GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 102 114 105 105 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 71.8
Write 71.3
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 108
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1
263% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 25.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 24.7
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,451
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback