Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110N-CF  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 23:27
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 392
51% 386 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.2
5% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 32 2.6 74 96 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 81.4
Write 247
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 58.2
23% 100 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 8.7
54% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 0.1
36% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 86%
Samsung HD204UI 240GB
60GB free
Firmware: S8FM07.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 308 271 426 438 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 471
Write 388
Mixed 235
SusWrite 382
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 21.6
94% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 67.2
76% 128 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%
SAMSUNG SSD PM85 256GB
69GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 40 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.1% Very good
Read 38.3
Write 38.6
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 41
53% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 14.4
1,188% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 23
DQ Mixed 15.8
1,379% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110N-CF Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $184
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback