Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171121
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '22 at 01:09
Run Duration	267 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 74 1-Core 101 2-Core 186 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 523 55% 439 Pts	64-Core 518 32% 518 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Lighting 39.7 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 39.1 32% 40.2 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 42.8 Splatting 28.4 29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U128G1122 128GB 823 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4162000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 96 82 91 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	77% Very good	Read 409 Write 97.7 Mixed 240 SusWrite 94.3 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 39.7 137% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 193 168% 252 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 94%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$107 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 734GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 482 482 482 482 465 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 479 Mixed 423 SusWrite 479 106% 471 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 50 166% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 361 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.5 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 92.4 43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	27x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1400AMD $87Bench 61%, 71,313 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	11x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $65Bench 104%, 11,104 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	5x
Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 37,374 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16