Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '22 at 17:58
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 247
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 892
84% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,380
85% 1,380 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
PNY(196E 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 68
58% 71.1 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 66.8
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1252 999 974 970 954 919 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,470
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,298
SusWrite 1,011
310% 1,376 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 83
283% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,128
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 972
718% 955 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 250%
Great: 435%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
74GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 81 82 81 82 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 479
Mixed 399
SusWrite 145
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 50
173% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 198 196 198 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 151
Mixed 83
SusWrite 196
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2933C15D4/8GX KHX2933C15D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 20.1
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 22.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $633
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback