MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '22 at 15:10
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 28.4
1-Core 39.2
2-Core 104
30% 57.1 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 436
38% 325 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$301
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.20.16
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 87.4
Reflection 79.4
Parallax 210
71% 126 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 101
Splatting 137
107% 131 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ngff 2242 1TB SSD
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 296 34 9.4 3.2 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 351
Write 267
Mixed 282
SusWrite 98.5
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
21% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 89%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 206 209 206 214 212 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 199
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 210
128% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.5
282% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 118%
Great: 138%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$90
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 91 84 88 86 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 32.2
Write 77.8
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 88.6
42% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16D4/16GX 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K 40GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
34.5% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 15.3
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.4
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 265
15% 265 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 16,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback