Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H97M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180408
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '22 at 23:16
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770T-$380 629 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 101 2-Core 197 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 557 58% 464 Pts	64-Core 564 35% 564 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.65 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Lighting 20.8 Reflection 18 Parallax 20.6 17% 19.8 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 16.5 17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-000H1 256GB 12,950 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS4NFXV SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 117 111 139 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Read 647 Write 149 Mixed 219 SusWrite 128 62% 286 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 34.7 129% 46.1 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 154 124% 177 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 192%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB 24,830 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 34GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 404 393 421 425 405 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 465 Write 437 Mixed 373 SusWrite 401 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 71.9 4K Mixed 42.7 145% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 289 236% 337 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 119%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 52GB free Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 145 108 105 106 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 470 Write 418 Mixed 356 SusWrite 158 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 66.8 4K Mixed 36.5 135% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 304 DQ Write 342 DQ Mixed 221 194% 289 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 91%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB 4,404 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 37GB free, PID null, Sandis Ultra Flair 128GB SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 45 45 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 143 Write 36.9 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 44.2 60% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.2 89% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 44%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 13 11 8.1 6.9 6.3 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 83 Write 13.2 Mixed 39.6 SusWrite 8.5 38% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1 99% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 30%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	60% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 18.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 20 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 67.9 59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	250x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	120x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	109x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	92x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	73x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	62x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	31x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	27x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	44x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16