Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Gaming K6 (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '17 at 13:39
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 138 2-Core 275 94% 169 Pts	4-Core 544 8-Core 547 73% 545 Pts	64-Core 546 34% 546 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing below potential (55^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 109 Parallax 98.6 83% 103 fps	MRender 90.1 Gravity 92.8 Splatting 82.6 72% 88.5 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12796 (0C) Power cycle count 86 86 13971 (B1) Unknown 94 94 63 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 55 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 49 (F1) Unknown 99 99 49209263996	86.9% Excellent	Read 495 Write 352 Mixed 339 88% 395 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 78.2 4K Mixed 20.8 136% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 46.3 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 20.5 52% 102 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 108%
OCZ VERTEX2 60GB 4,861 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 7GB free Firmware: 1.32 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2498937 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 34351148459681 (0C) Power cycle count 86 86 14591 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 58 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 89 89 11 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 99 99 2498937 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3520 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2752 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2752 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6464	42.4% Average	Read 205 Write 80.7 Mixed 111 29% 132 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 7.58 88% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 72.7 DQ Mixed 10.1 33% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 41GB free Firmware: CC35 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 99 8564644 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 69 69 32364 (05) Reallocated sector count 61 61 1613 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 133227028293 (09) Power-on hours count 51 51 43473 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 86 86 14658 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 72 72 28 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065667 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 48 471269404 (C2) HDA temperature 28 52 55834574876 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 44 17 8564644 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -81046032805349 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3925218908 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3424923265	43.7% Average	Read 91.1 Write 61.2 Mixed 79.3 58% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.32 81% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.6% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 13 43% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 14.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 61.4 65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Gaming K6 Builds (Compare 664 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 70%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Gaming K6

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	368x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	79x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	69x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	106x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	95x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	78x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	36x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	34x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	26x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $488

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16