Performance Results


Gaming 129% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 131% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C73
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z490 GAMING CARBON WIFI (all builds)
Memory	26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200722
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '21 at 08:17
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900K-$410 107,269 User benchmarks, average bench 100% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 91.7 1-Core 154 2-Core 301 100% 182 Pts	4-Core 594 8-Core 1038 99% 816 Pts	64-Core 1,676 104% 1,676 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 106%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 168 Reflection 169 Parallax 180 137% 172 fps	MRender 200 Gravity 153 Splatting 126 127% 160 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40 10,318 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 552 664 814 616 693 439 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	210% Outstanding	Read 1,802 Write 471 Mixed 217 SusWrite 630 170% 780 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 47.8 201% 75.5 MB/s	DQ Read 901 DQ Write 861 DQ Mixed 657 555% 806 MB/s
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 210% Great: 248%
Marshal MAL34000SA-T72 4TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: FJ1M Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 26.2 Mixed 3 11% 14.6 MB/s	4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0 69% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 111%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 693GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 38.5 Write 35.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 36.9 46% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.5 211% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TZD1G808U26-SK001 2x16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 25.2 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 33.2 SC Mixed 24.1 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 178%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 177%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	384x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	252x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	216x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	157x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	152x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	110x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,567

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16