Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-WW
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 05 '21 at 21:42
Run Duration296 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 97%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 88.7
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 89.2
49% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 216
25% 195 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 38
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 27
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 256GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 109 93 87 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 349
Write 100
Mixed 230
SusWrite 101
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 19.8
61% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 205
163% 234 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 127%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
90GB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 86 88 86 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 88.5
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 84
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 107C 3TB
295GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 97 95 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 96.8
Write 100
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 96.9
121% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2400 C15 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.9% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 21
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 6R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 21% 56 140 49 60 20.7" 1600 900 ACI20F4 ASUS VT207
History: Score 21: 4R 0G 1B | Score 26: 1R 4G 9B | Score 48: 6R 6G 0B
Typical GA-H110M-WW-CF Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-WW-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $118
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback