Zoostorm 7200-5328A

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5328A (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181127
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '21 at 00:54
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 104 2-Core 192 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 315 46% 335 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.5% Average	Lighting 64.7 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 61.2 53% 63.7 fps	MRender 63.8 Gravity 67.6 Splatting 0.2 31% 43.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 1TB SSD 1TB 4,965 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1128B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 14 87 165 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 433 Write 367 Mixed 350 SusWrite 67.3 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 85.2 4K Mixed 26.2 110% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 30.1 38% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 929GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 176 171 175 179 178 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 168 Mixed 102 SusWrite 176 115% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 24.1 77% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 21.8 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 79.9 50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5328A Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Raft

System: Zoostorm 7200-5328A

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	4x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB 2x8GBCrucialBench 67%, 1,583 samples	2x
HMA82GU6MFR8N-TF 2x16GBHynixBench 72%, 553 samples	1x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 CT8G4DFD8213.C16FHP 16GBCrucialBench 66%, 14 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $242

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16