PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS (all builds) |
Memory | 0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130927 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Feb 05 '21 at 14:10 |
Run Duration | 165 Seconds |
Run User | ROU-User |
Background CPU | 90% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
55.6%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.40
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 67 51 76 63 63 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
282GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 115 117 113 111 MB/s
|
65.4%
Good
|
|||
General UDisk 2GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.9 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s
|
2.8%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial STK3U1600C11081C 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
|
19.4%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 159x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 102x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 78x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 116x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 80x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $155 |