Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 09:34
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 131
2-Core 254
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 665
67% 542 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 40.7
Reflection 43
Parallax 38.5
33% 40.7 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 38.4
Splatting 33.5
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 928 840 756 861 825 561 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2,043
Write 1,332
Mixed 794
SusWrite 795
275% 1,241 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 61.9
229% 84.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 442
395% 615 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 232%
Great: 283%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
149GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 62 55 68 79 67 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.7% Outstanding
Read 254
Write 194
Mixed 81.3
SusWrite 66.4
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.7
521% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 202%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
15GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 18 29 11 16 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 93.2
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 24.9
38% 51.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 249%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$194
748GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 158 159 160 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 153
Write 151
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 158
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 98%
Hitachi HUS722T2TALA604 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: RAGNWA09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 173 174 176 178 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 117
Write 219
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 177
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
395% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 111%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
103GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 199 201 201 201 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 180
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 200
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.6
288% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 116%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.3
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 26.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 52.8
76% 52.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $450
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback