Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory30 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '17 at 06:43
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 232
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 931
82% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,290
80% 1,290 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 71.7
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 90
58% 77.4 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 57
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK1T0MBF 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: MU03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 475
Write 404
Mixed 359
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 14.5
95% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.7
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 14.4
38% 80 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 103%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 2,979
Write 1,489
Mixed 1,562
442% 2,010 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 92
4K Mixed 33.1
167% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 50.6
DQ Write 91.7
DQ Mixed 24.6
32% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 263%
Great: 254%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
80GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 504
Write 259
Mixed 356
82% 373 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 17.8
108% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 37.6
DQ Write 53.4
DQ Mixed 17.3
21% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 118%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
596GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 121
Write 104
Mixed 114
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.48
127% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 65%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
429GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 91.4
Mixed 97.5
73% 96.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.19
73% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 67%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 165
Write 158
Mixed 138
195% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.25
98% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.7% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 21.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 20.9
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,750 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $860
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback