Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190909
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '20 at 22:36
Run Duration	1075 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 78.3 1-Core 150 2-Core 302 94% 177 Pts	4-Core 603 8-Core 1,200 106% 902 Pts	64-Core 2,283 141% 2,283 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 109 Reflection 115 Parallax 109 89% 111 fps	Gravity 99.4 Splatting 101 89% 100 fps
Poor: 71% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60 9,893 User benchmarks, average bench 274% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 3.6 633 236 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 475 Write 1,165 Mixed 465 SusWrite 146 128% 563 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 35.5 122% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 840 DQ Write 489 DQ Mixed 660 492% 663 MB/s
Poor: 154% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 390%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$45 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 94GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 409 391 396 399 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 493 Write 417 Mixed 418 SusWrite 266 89% 398 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 40.8 133% 45.7 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 185 143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 125%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 383GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 255 263 271 273 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 356 Write 330 Mixed 317 SusWrite 177 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 45.9 149% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 202 152% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 129%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 38GB free Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 85 80 85 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 249 Write 86 Mixed 117 SusWrite 55.5 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 51.9 4K Mixed 11.8 73% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 78.5 DQ Mixed 77.1 66% 97.7 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 44%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 102GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 487 Write 437 Mixed 316 92% 413 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 65.1 4K Mixed 36.7 124% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 118 111% 174 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 233GB free Firmware: 05.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 106 91 87 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 108 Write 95.8 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 61.2 63% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 734GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.2 90 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 61.3 Write 79 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 31.9 43% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 194% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 90%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 164 172 169 167 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Read 186 Write 189 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 112 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 436% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 500GB free Firmware: JKAO SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 22 20 22 23 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 22.1 Mixed 20 SusWrite 14.6 18% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 69%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 145 Write 123 Mixed 73.5 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 196GB free Firmware: JKAO Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 94.2 Write 67.5 Mixed 54.7 54% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 69%
Seagate NAS HDD 4TB-$145 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 634GB free Firmware: SC43 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 145 Write 143 Mixed 67 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 272GB free Firmware: 80.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 116 Write 112 Mixed 65.2 72% 97.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 84%
WDC WD15 EARS-00Z5B1 1.5TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 537GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 25 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 79.8 Write 27.2 Mixed 30.7 SusWrite 17.7 44% 38.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 39%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 268GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 83 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 65.2 Write 76 Mixed 43.9 SusWrite 29.5 71% 53.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 56%
WDC WD80 0JD-75MSA3 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 72GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 35.6 Write 37.2 Mixed 28.3 43% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 16%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 130 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 286GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 67.7 Write 62.3 Mixed 44.9 72% 58.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 48%
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 750GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 34.6 Write 36.8 Mixed 26.4 42% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 39%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 386GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 99.4 Write 97.7 Mixed 58.6 106% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3733 C17 Series 4x8GB 384 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 51.6 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 45.2 134% 46.9 GB/s	SC Read 25.2 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 40 88% 30.6 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 128%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,920x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,342x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1,106x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,105x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	880x
RTX 3090Nvidia $835Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	612x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	847x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	708x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	434x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	187x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $82Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,752

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16