Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Memory 44.3 1-Core 16.5 2-Core 28.2 22% 29.7 Pts	4-Core 28.8 8-Core 13.3 3% 21 Pts	64-Core 29 2% 29 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7300 Series Graphics 103 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AF2) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.352.1015.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.87% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 1.28 1% 1.22 fps	MRender 1.29 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.87% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 360GB free (System drive) Firmware: 18.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 100 101 102 101 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 86.1 Write 98.8 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 101 64% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB 368 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.1% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.3 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	2x

SSD
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	1x

RAM
8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1 8KTF25664HZ-1G6M1 4GBMicronBench 11%, 8 samples	1x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 49%, 186 samples	1x

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $14

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16