Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 70 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 134 54% 91 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 316 37% 284 Pts	64-Core 288 18% 288 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 8589) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	4.26% Terrible	Lighting 6.23 Reflection 6.58 Parallax 7.16 5% 6.66 fps	MRender 4.43 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 0.09 3% 3.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.26% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 161 16 19 27 16 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20.3% Poor	Read 134 Write 93 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 70.3 21% 94.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 8.3 32% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 16.2 DQ Write 16.9 DQ Mixed 14.9 12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3E1 1x8GB 1,278 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 10.8 28% 9.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 7.9 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	226x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16