Asus B150M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus B150M-C (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160510
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 22:15
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 50.7 1-Core 110 2-Core 201 65% 121 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 552 59% 470 Pts	64-Core 174 11% 174 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (98^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)	56.5% Above average	Lighting 69.4 Reflection 69.3 Parallax 59.5 57% 66.1 fps	MRender 70.6 Gravity 66 Splatting 69.4 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0105A SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 26 158 69 14 66 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.9% Above average	Read 243 Write 264 Mixed 234 SusWrite 79.1 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 61.9 4K Mixed 21.6 96% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 46.6 88% 172 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 47GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 140 138 141 140 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 113 Write 138 Mixed 41.7 SusWrite 138 78% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 1x16GB 1,141 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B150M-C Builds (Compare 772 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B150M-C

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	212x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	135x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	75x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	84x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	36x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	24x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	17x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 70%, 1,758 samples	15x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $162

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16