Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GE
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 16:06
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU4%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 114
2-Core 190
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 536
50% 415 Pts
64-Core 903
56% 903 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 18FE) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4575
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 42.1
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 34.5
34% 35.5 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 33.1
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0922H1S
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 403 408 440 449 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 408
Mixed 396
SusWrite 417
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 30.2
118% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 233
184% 253 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
259GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 50 68 62 65 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 6.3
Write 1.7
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 63
18% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
82% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 70%
Kingston DataTraveler 120 16GB
8GB free, PID 1623
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 3.1 3.4 3.1 3.5 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.39% Terrible
Read 5.3
Write 2
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 3.1
4% 3.05 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.39%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.2% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.3
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 25.8
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE Builds (Compare 1,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GE_FX80GE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback