| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20131002 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 17 '16 at 11:33 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 7% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62%
Good
|
57% 90.4 Pts
|
32% 248 Pts
|
17% 278 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 285-$189
CLim: 965 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1
|
35.9%
Below average
|
37% 51.6 fps
|
34% 42.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
33.5%
Below average
|
34% 154 MB/s
|
56% 21.3 MB/s
|
18% 32.3 MB/s
|
|
|
72.5%
Very good
|
85% 114 MB/s
|
79% 0.86 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 333 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.8%
Below average
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
23% 8.03 GB/s
|
56% 71.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 960GM-VGS3 FX Builds (Compare 214 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 960GM-VGS3 FX - $59
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 26x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 17x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 13x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $236 |