Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)-$130 12,547 User benchmarks, average bench 50% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 132 56% 92.6 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 218 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% PNY(196E 11BF) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 37.7 33% 36.4 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 36.9 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 285GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 15 7 31 13 168 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 375 Write 297 Mixed 269 SusWrite 58.6 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 16.6 56% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 78.4 DQ Mixed 44.2 47% 79 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 12GB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.5% Poor	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 9.6 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 9.1 23% 7.93 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-6700 APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $130Bench 50%, 12,547 samples	23x

RAM
HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 12GBHynixBench 38%, 85 samples	4x
RMR5030EF68F9W1600 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 12GBRamaxelBench 27%, 23 samples	4x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	1x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $238

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16