Asus Z170-P D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170-P D3  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 442
60% 447 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.3% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 58.5
54% 65.3 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 63.5
Splatting 67.1
54% 66 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 270 283 281 279 276 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 494
Write 288
Mixed 278
SusWrite 276
74% 334 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 40.4
161% 60.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35.5
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 155
93% 97 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 128%
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
52GB free
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 84.5
Write 32.8
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 34.2
11% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 15.3
56% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 24.5
DQ Mixed 16.8
14% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 45%
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
193GB free
Firmware: UF3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 92 103 62 82 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 409
Write 146
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 93
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 18.1
77% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 61.7
DQ Mixed 7.8
27% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 56%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
494GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 85 97 94 94 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 73.5
Write 68.2
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 93
48% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 75%
Toshiba E300 3TB-$116
2.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 109 112 108 113 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 65
Write 100
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 109
51% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TD8G16C11-H11 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 CT102464BA160B.C16 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.7% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.1
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P D3 Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P D3 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $280
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback