Asus CM1831

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus CM1831  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CM1831
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110818
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 21:28
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 118
56% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 324
32% 263 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
Asus(1043 8388) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.28
0% 0.67 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.33
Splatting 1.13
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 136 89 62 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 186
Write 160
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 84.1
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 114%
29GB free, PID 5400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.5 6 5.8 6.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
5.63% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 19.7
Mixed 4.8
SusWrite 5.1
16% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
25% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.63%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CM1831 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CM1831

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback