Asus P5QL PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P5QL PRO (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090701
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '19 at 20:43
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115 20,482 User benchmarks, average bench 44% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 70.8 1-Core 42.8 2-Core 84.1 43% 65.9 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 171 22% 165 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 861F) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	4.5% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 5.46 Parallax 6.78 4% 5.77 fps	MRender 4.29 Gravity 7.27 Splatting 7.13 5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.5% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
V Series SATA SSD 120GB 3,411 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 191 77 64 61 63 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.6% Average	Read 243 Write 220 Mixed 199 SusWrite 88.8 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 11.3 75% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 79.7 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 17.3 39% 77.6 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500820AS 500GB 4,420 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 150GB free Firmware: SD25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 96 98 98 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	52.3% Above average	Read 86.7 Write 13.7 Mixed 46.2 SusWrite 95.7 45% 60.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 95% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 60%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 31GB free Firmware: 1AC01112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 77 77 77 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 95.5 Write 49.2 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 77.3 53% 71.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 234GB free Firmware: 0739 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 31 31 32 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 31.2 Mixed 23.7 SusWrite 30.6 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 97%
ASMT 2115 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 41GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 141 Write 100 Mixed 108 SusWrite 2.2 108% 88 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 20.9 4K Mixed 8.6 1,054% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 22.6 DQ Mixed 8.9 1,127% 15.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 185%
ASMT 2115 1TB 378 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 146GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 29.7 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 20.3 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 189%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 17,632 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 219GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 89.5 Write 57.2 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 1.9 58% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,310 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 126GB free, PID 0202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 58 Write 58.5 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 3.3 46% 37 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 45%
ASMT 2115 1.5TB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 153GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 95.5 Write 82 Mixed 46 SusWrite 2.2 68% 56.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 47%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 1,122 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 349GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 86.7 Write 85 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 1.8 59% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 1,122 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 550GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 20 20 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 30.5 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 20.3 33% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 7 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.3 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QL PRO Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL PRO

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	43x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	28x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	13x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	132x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	44x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16