Acer Aspire X3900

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire X3900 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer FIH57
Memory	1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100120
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 650-$70 42,063 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Memory 70.4 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 132 57% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 202 8-Core 208 27% 205 Pts	64-Core 205 13% 205 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570 12,172 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sapphire(174B E142) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 6.7 Parallax 5 0% 3.97 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 5.4 4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 388GB free (System drive) Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 12 16 29 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 75.6 Write 71.6 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 22.4 43% 57.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 67%
ASMT 2115 2TB 1,348 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 25 25 25 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 27.2 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 25.2 37% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 118% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 111%
IC25N020 ATCS04-0 20GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 10GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	4.89% Terrible	Read 9 Write 9.8 Mixed 8.8 SusWrite 10.5 13% 9.52 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.89% Great: 8%
WDC WD10 00FYPS-01ZKB0 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 9GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	15.5% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 27.1 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 22.9 34% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 15%
ASMT 2115 120GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 30GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	2.99% Terrible	Read 1 Write 1 Mixed 1 SusWrite 0.8 1% 0.95 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 58% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.99% Great: 185%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 12.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.3 SC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 37%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 38: 5R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
38%	17%	72	42	26	60	25.5"	1920 1200	JEN50C6 JT269x6-1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire X3900 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X3900

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	41x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	13x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	8x

GPU
GeForce GT 320NvidiaBench 3%, 2,109 samples	15x
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 12,172 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBUnknownBench 27%, 1,099 samples	5x
GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 GU512303EP0202 GU502203EP0201 6GBHitachiBench 31%, 138 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 3x2GBToshibaBench 31%, 210 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $83

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16