Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 10% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Memory 42 1-Core 17.1 2-Core 28.3 21% 29.1 Pts	4-Core 42.1 8-Core 42.8 6% 42.4 Pts	64-Core 42.6 3% 42.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 040A) 763MB Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2281 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.65% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.19 Parallax 0.59 1% 0.88 fps	MRender 0.57 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 1 0% 0.61 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.65% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB 2,396 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: D005DEM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 17 14 22 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 36 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 18.3 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.1 38% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT112S6BFR6C-G7 2x1GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 7.1 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 2 6% 2.2 GB/s	Latency 193 21% 193 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
NVS 3100MNvidiaBench 1%, 9,073 samples	396x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	16x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	32x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	20x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	20x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16