Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160627
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 01:11
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 112
49% 78.1 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 293
29% 239 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.5% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 68
52% 70 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 70
58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 34 31 36 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.6% Below average
Read 170
Write 69
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 36.4
19% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 22.8
68% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.3
DQ Write 58.3
DQ Mixed 27.5
26% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
816GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 38 33 40 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 123
Write 83.5
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 42
60% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AAJ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 77 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 74.3
Write 54
Mixed 42.8
SusWrite 78.5
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 43%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU2 1TB
221GB free, PID 01c5
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.69% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 23.5
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 17.3
27% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.69%
Great: 20%
WD 1200BEV External 120GB
32GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 27
Write 26
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 17.1
30% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 76.9
52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,268 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $134
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback