Asrock B75M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B75M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120730
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 18 '18 at 15:48
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 96.5 2-Core 197 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 360 40% 313 Pts	64-Core 396 24% 396 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 40.4 Reflection 31.2 Parallax 42.4 33% 38 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 36.8 31% 38 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 138 127 161 159 81 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.8% Above average	Read 249 Write 240 Mixed 227 SusWrite 136 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 30.1 102% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 30.8 69% 142 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 322GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 149 151 153 152 152 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 139 Write 132 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 145 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TMS4GB364F08116BEM 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.3% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 12.5 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-DGS Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-DGS - $58

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	26x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	23x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	15x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	14x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	9x
HMT41GU7BFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 49%, 175 samples	6x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $257

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16