Today's hottest deals

Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.2 GB free of 15.9844 GB
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJul 30 '18 at 02:14
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.9% Above average
Memory 60
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 168
58% 104 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 322
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-1Q
Nvidia(10DE 114D) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 386.9
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 20.6
18% 22.8 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 28.7
23% 27.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 215GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PVS
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,013
Write 726
Mixed 927
198% 889 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 8.7
114% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 42.9
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 239
143% 146 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 42%
Xensrc PVDISK 24GB
22GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 320
Write 430
Mixed 328
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 17.1
4K Mixed 15.5
45% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 403
DQ Mixed 339
263% 357 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 16%
Xensrc PVDISK 9GB
7GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 252
Write 183
Mixed 248
172% 228 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 12.6
2,079% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 347
3,168% 344 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 54.8
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 49.1
131% 46 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback