Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Memory 48.1 1-Core 22.7 2-Core 45.9 26% 38.9 Pts	4-Core 89.2 8-Core 89.3 12% 89.2 Pts	64-Core 86.8 5% 86.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 2219) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 1.88 1% 2.14 fps	MRender 2.19 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB 11,302 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 293GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 338 346 348 338 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 372 Write 355 Mixed 272 SusWrite 336 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 22.6 72% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 145 109% 145 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown V01L3S88GB52852816 2x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.9 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 168 24% 168 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GBSamsungBench 45%, 347 samples	1x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 4GBSamsungBench 38%, 363 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16