Cisco UCSB-B200-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemCisco UCSB-B200-M4  (all builds)
MotherboardCisco UCSB-B200-M4
Memory123.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160811
Uptime17.2 Days
Run DateJul 24 '18 at 14:31
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 75
2-Core 151
54% 94.9 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 560
51% 430 Pts
64-Core 1,580
98% 1,580 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI UCSB-MRAID12G 239GB
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.62
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 289 289 288 289 290 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.6% Excellent
Read 294
Write 290
Mixed 237
SusWrite 289
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 38.5
142% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 210
167% 241 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA82GR7MFR4N-UH 8x16GB
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.4% Excellent
MC Read 49
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 30.5
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 15.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback