Panasonic CF-52VACBYFT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.02GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.02GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPanasonic CF-52VACBYFT  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic CF52-5
Memory1.8 GB free of 4.01563 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 16:51
Run Duration105 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 93
2-Core 168
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 225
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7750M
Device(10F7 8338) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.961.6.0
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.53% Terrible
Lighting 7.37
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 10.5
6% 9.07 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7.5
Splatting 12
8% 8.82 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.53%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS541050A9E680 500GB
390GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 78 81 78 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 66.5
Write 60.8
Mixed 26
SusWrite 78.4
42% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 52GB
1600, 0 MHz
4096, 49152 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback