Toshiba Qosmio F30-111

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba Qosmio F30-111  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '16 at 02:09
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7400
uFC-PGA Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 67.5
1-Core 24
2-Core 49.6
34% 47 Pts
4-Core 49.6
8-Core 49.6
7% 49.6 Pts
64-Core 49.9
3% 49.9 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 38%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba RAID LD0 250GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware:
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 63.3
Write 63
Mixed 17
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.32
83% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 13.6
Mixed 16.4
21% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.16
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.01
24% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 8%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback