IBM 00MV214

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardIBM 00MV214  (all builds)
Memory33.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180215
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateJun 25 '18 at 14:01
Run Duration100 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2603 v2
Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 35.8
2-Core 71.5
38% 57.5 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 361
32% 268 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 2TB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.45
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
293% Outstanding
Read 2,469
Write 2,623
Mixed 3,483
643% 2,859 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 33.1
98% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 62.8
DQ Write 54.1
DQ Mixed 31.4
31% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 293%
Great: 293%
IBM ServeRAID M5110e 511GB
158GB free
Firmware: 3.45
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.6% Very good
Read 866
Write 144
Mixed 303
94% 438 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 26.6
77% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 78.1
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 39.8
40% 65.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CMA 4x16GB
4 of 24 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 19
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback